Cita medico madrid online

Ads online dating service for professionals Online dating service

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Online dating or Internet dating is a personal introductory system where individuals can find and contact each other over the Internet to arrange a Pedir cita pediatra mallorca, usually with the objective of developing a personal, romantic, or sexual relationship. Online dating services usually provide Rencontres celibataires perpignan Anima gemella sukriboy over the Relazioni extraconiugali opinioni, through the use of анкеты аниме персонажей or знакомства Users of an online dating service would usually provide personal information, to enable them to search the service provider's database for other individuals. Members use criteria other members set, such as age range, gender and location.

Online dating sites use market metaphors to match people. Match metaphors are conceptual frameworks that allow individuals to make sense of new concepts by drawing upon familiar experiences and frame-works. This metaphor of the marketplace – a place where people go to “shop” for potential romantic partners and to “sell” themselves in hopes of creating a successful romantic relationship – is highlighted by the layout and functionality of online dating websites. The marketplace metaphor may also resonate with participants’ conceptual orientation towards the process of finding a romantic partner.сайты знакомств христианские Most sites allow members to upload photos or videos of themselves and browse the photos and videos of others. Sites may offer additional services, such as Rencontre 12-13 ans, Rencontre 13 f, telephone chat (Site de rencontres des hommes celibataires 100 gratuit), and Site de rencontre pour les ado 12-18 gratuitement. Some sites provide free registration, but may offer services which require a monthly fee. Other sites depend on advertising for their revenue. Some sites such as Site de rencontre pour les 40 ans et, Jeu de rencontre en ligne gratuit pour ado and Rencontre juif are free and offer additional paid services in a Rencontres gourmandes vaison 2013 revenue model.Site de rencontre tarn et garonne

Some sites are broad-based, with members coming from a variety of backgrounds looking for different types of relationships. Other sites are more specific, based on the type of members, interests, location, or relationship desired. A 2005 study of data collected by the Site de rencontre gratuit jeuxvideo found that individuals are more likely to use an online dating service if they use the internet for a greater amount of tasks and less likely to use such a service if they are trusting of others.Voir film rencontre du troisieme type

Ads online dating service for professionals Trends[] Online dating service - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

At the end of November 2004, there were 844 lifestyle and dating sites, a 38% increase since the start of the year, according to Hitwise Inc. However, market share was increasingly growing by several large commercial services, including , , , and .com. By 2007, many prominent studies show that interest in online dating have soared. In 2005–2012, 34.95% of Americans had met their spouses online

The United States generated $957 million in revenue in 2008 from online dating services

Some online dating websites provide webcam chats between members. As online dating's population becomes larger, sites with specific demographics are becoming more popular as a way to narrow the pool of potential matches.

Successful niche sites pair people by race, sexual orientation or religion. The 20 most popular dating sites in 2006 as ranked by Hitwise include .com (for Jewish singles),,, (same sex introductions), LoveFromIndia.ini,, (for Latino singles),, and (for Indian singles). In March 2008, the top 5 overall sites held 7% less market share than they did one year ago while the top sites from the top five major niche dating categories made considerable gains.

In 2008, one of the "hottest trends in online dating" was the babyboomers on the top dating sites. Around 30% of America's 80 million babyboomers are single.

Since 2003, several free dating sites, operating on ad based-revenue rather than monthly subscriptions, have appeared and become increasingly popular. Several newer sites such as .com are beginning to offer more full featured dating services for free, and are starting to compete with staples in the free dating site world such as . Due to the level of competition between free dating sites, as well as the overall drop in traffic to and revenue for dating sites generally, some sites are branching out into self-service advertising. This represents a break from traditional externally sourced ads and is just one of the ways that the revenue models of free dating sites are evolving.

Especially popular in Eastern Europe, some sites offer full access to messaging and profiles, but provide additional services for pay, such as bumping profiles up to the top of the list, removing advertisements, making paying users' profiles appear several times in different places in the search results, and giving paying users a more advanced search engine to work with (in one example, free users may only search for persons of specified age, gender, orientation, and city, while subscribers may search for any and all parameters listed in profiles, such as height, weight, interests, etc.). Also, this model generally allows users to switch between free and paying status at will and without having to do anything, simply providing advanced features for a set period of time whenever the according payment is received. Ease of payment is also generally higher, with such sites accepting a variety of online currencies, letting users charge the payment to their cellular phones, etc. Such sites earn revenue from a mix of advertising and sale of additional options.

Online daters may have more liberal social attitudes compared to the general population in the United States.

Ads online dating service for professionals From generalist OD websites to specialized ones[] Online dating service - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Whereas some websites are for the general public, others pursue a niche strategy.

Type of desired relationship[]

OD websites may be specialized for romantic relationship (.com, , .com, ), for sexual relationship (.com, ) or for friendly relationship ().

Community membership[]

These websites target people who specifically look for a partner who is

  • by religion:
    •  :,, in France ; in Côte d'Ivoire ;,, in the USA.
      •  : in the USA.
      •  : in France.
      • /: and in the USA.
      •  : and in the USA and in Canada.
      •  :, and in the USA.
    •  :, , in France ; and in the world.
      •  : and in the USA, in Canada, in the UK, in Pakistan and in India.
    •  : and .fr in France, in Russia, .com in the world.
      •  : in Canada, in the USA and in Israël.
    •  : in the USA.
    •  : in the USA.
    •  : in the USA and in the UK.
    •  : in the USA and in the UK.
  • by ethnicity

sorcerer : in the USA and in the UK

    •  :,,, in France ; in the USA.;
    •  : , and in Asia.
    •  : and in the world.
    • from the Portuguese  : in France.
    • etc. In the latter case, a distinction is required between OD websites for Slavic people who want to meet other Slavic people and OD websites for non Slavic people who want to meet Slavic people ( and in France).
    • in the USA, Europe, World

Matchmaking websites[]

Main article:

Matchmaking OD websites suppose that two people must share affinities if they consider a serious and long-term relationship. As classic OD websites sometimes suggest a list of singles who should be compatible given what they fulfill (age, sex, city, hobbies etc.), matchmaking OD websites offer a more detailed study.

Psychological matchmaking[]

Matchmaking OD websites (, , , .fr and .fr in France) usually use theory on personality and matchmaking (religion, culture, interests, aspirations etc.) for suggesting members. The matchmaking service make members fulfill , which can sometimes reach about one hundreds of pages, and suggest members who are likely to match.
The site .fr is founded on the works of the German psychologist and the (subsidiary of ) on the studies of the American anthropologist . According to the latter, there should be four types of personality : Explorers, Builders, Directors and Negotiators. Couples who are most likely to work are Explorer-Explorer, Builder-Builder and Directory-Negotiator (in the latter case, the two profiles complete each other).

Political matchmaking[]

These OD websites are specialized for people from ( in France), (, (, or ( and in France, in the USA). In the USA, there are also some OD websites for (), (, or (

Music matchmaking[]

Some websites ( · in the USA, in France) offer both service and dating service. The users can identify and contact those who listen to the same soundtracks and may even receive a list of singles who are supposed to match according to their musical preferences.

Lifestyle matchmaking[]

Some OD websites are specialized by or hobbies : dating for

  • , , , or  :, and in France ;,,,, .com · and in the USA and in the UK.
  •  : in France.
  •  : in Germany.
  •  : in Germany, in the UK, in the USA.
  •  : in France, in the USA.
  •  : and in France, in the UK, in the USA.
  • : .com · in the USA.
  •  : in France, in the USA ·  · etc.
  •  : in France, in the USA · .
  •  : · .
  •  : in the USA, in the UK and in India.
  •  :,,,  ·
  • enathusiasts:
  • fans of  : in the UK ·  · .
  • fans of  : and in the USA and in Canada ; in the UK.
  • fans of  : and in the USA.
  • fans of  : in the USA and in the UK.
  •  : the American website suggests to date people according to the  ·
  • fans of  : · in the USA.
  •  : in France, in the USA.
  •  : in the USA ; and in the UK.
  •  : and in the USA ; in the UK ; in France.
  •  : or in France ; or in the USA. This ODSs have to be distinguished from « OD websites for animals », like ·

Genetic matchmaking[]

Main article:

These websites used the DNA to suggest singles (, · and  · in the USA).

Astral matchmaking[]

The matchmaking is here founded on ( and in France ; and in the USA), ( in the USA, in Canada, in Australia and in France) or ( in France).

The OD websites according to the social situation[]

Specialization by profession[]

OD websites for

  •  : in the USA.;
  • or for  : and in France ; in the UK ; in the USA ; in Germany.
  •  : in France.
  • or  : in the USA.
  •  : and in France.
  •  : and in France.
  • / /  : and in France ; .com, and in the USA ; in the UK.

Specialization for elites[]

OD websites designed for

  • higher education graduates : and in France ; in Germany, in Austria and in Switzerland ; · in the UK ;
    • exclusively for graduates of  : · in France ; .com · and in the USA ;
  • for the rich and beautiful : in Germany, connects beautiful women with people who earn more than 100 000 euro a year. In the USA, is intended for very wealthy individuals and claims « Our members include CEOs, pro athletes, doctors, lawyers, investors, entrepreneurs, beauty queens, fitness models and Hollywood celebrities ».

It is important to clearly distinguish elitist OD websites from online elitist dating agencies (,, or also from elitist social network sites (.com).

It should be noted that a distinction must also be made between elitist OD websites and « high-range » OD websites like . On the site, where furthermore the inscription works by cooptation, the conditions to entry concern less the social situation than the seriousness of the singles in their will of building a relationship.

Specialization for students[]

The site .com is for or .

Specialization by conjugal status[]

Whereas non-specialized OD are for singles, other OD are specialized for married persons ( and .com in France ; in the UK, in the world · ), divorced with children ( in the USA, in France) or widowed individuals ( in France ; in the UK and in the USA).

Some OD websites are designed for ( · ,, and in the USA ) or for ( ; see also the ).

The will of getting married and/or building a family is mainly emphasized on the ( and in France ;, the Indian OD website focused on religious and intracaste marriages). Nevertheless, marriage is also emphasized on (, in France), or on Chinese OD websites (). Furthermore, it is worth noting that is intended in India for those who do not want to get married by the .

Certain sites underline the will of building a family without evoking marriage : this is the case of in Denmark or in France. Conversely, some websites are designed for «  » ( in France, in the USA).

There is also OD websites intended for people who are looking for sperm/oocyte donnor-recipients (See , ) : in France.

Meet an Inmate[]

There are some websites which make it possible to correspond with an incarcerated person : , · or in the USA ; in Canada.

OD websites according to sexuality[]

The specialization of OD websites is also done according to sexuality in each one :


OD websites for ( in the world), or more specifically for ( and in France ;, and in the USA), ( in France ; in the UK ; in the USA), ( in France, in the USA), ( in France, in the USA) ; ( in France).


OD websites for ( and in France) and more specifically for or ( and in France) ; ( ; ( and in France).

or []

OD websites for or  : in France ;, and in the USA, in Canada and in the UK.
OD websites for : in France ;, and in the USA.


& []

OD websites for & : in France ; and in Belgium ; in Switzerland.

& []

OD websites for &  · : in France ; [for gays] in the USA.

& Sugar babies[]

and in France ; , , · , and  · in the USA.

& []

OD websites for &  : and in the USA.

[] in France.

or [] and in France ;,, and in the USA ; in the world.

[] in France.

[] in France.

OD websites based on physical criterion[]

There are specialized dating website, whether you are ( in France ; in the USA), ( in the USA and in the UK, in France, in Belgium), ( in France, in Germany), ( in France, in the UK, and in the USA), ( and in the USA), ( in the UK), ( in the USA), ( in France, in the USA) or ( in France).

In the USA and in the UK, the website is intended for . ·

The website suggests you to find your ex-partner's  ·  · .

OD websites for people with disease or disability[]

Some OD websites are intended for people living with ( and in France ; in the USA ; in Canada ; in the world · ).

Other websites are designed for people with disabilities ( and in France ; in Belgium ; in Canada ; in the UK ;, and in the USA) ; or more specifically, for ( in the USA), ( in the USA), or ( and in France ; and in the USA) but also for ( in the USA).

There are also OD websites destined to people suffering from like , , , , , or ( in the USA, in Canada) ; and (AS) .

In France, the website is targeted to .

OD websites per age group[]

Some websites are focused on dating for teenager, other for ( in France ; and in the USA).

OD websites per geographic area[]

Some websites extend their services per geographic area.

OD websites per meeting point[]

The American site is intended for those who want to meet at the airport.

OD websites according to the ways of dating[]

The OD websites differentiate themselves according to the way of dating they invite the users. Before the dating, there may be a first contact online (standard online dating, , epistolary OD websites, card dating, virtual darting, ) or not (slow dating, , , ). Arranging the appointment can be direct (standard online dating, mobile dating) or intermediated (coached dating, , speed dating, blind dating, slow dating, group dating, charity dating).

Standard Online dating[]

OD websites generally refer to standard online dating (on, .com, .fr in France): on his computer, the user registers on the website, looks for profiles which are likely to appeal to him, makes the first contact, which, if it is conclusive, leads to the arrangement of an appointment.

Mobile dating[]

Main article:
  • After the development of the in the 2000s, the has in turn boosted the dating market in the 2010s. The standard websites like , , , or offer a mobile version or an application to download of their OD services, like the new actors exclusively on smartphone: (generalist) or (gay). Mobile dating proposes exchange of instant messages or pictures but also and above all so as to singles nearby should be able to make connections. Some findings done by for his book "" show that people are getting used to find someone to talk to online and having a close relationship with them. He found that, between 2005 and 2012, more than one third of couples that got married in the United States met on an online dating site. One main way people incorporate dating with their mobile devices in . Aziz Ansari also found interesting facts on sexting. They include:
  • Half of eighteen- to twenty-four-year-olds have received sexts
  • People who own iPhones are twice as likely to sext as people who use Androids
  • The most popular time to sext is Tuesday between 10:00 A.M. and noon.
  • 59% of people now consider mobile dating an accpetable way to meet a partner

Coached dating[]

Main article:

The OD websites users may have recourse to a ( · , and in the USA ; and ·  · in France): the services provided range from the identification of the OD service where to register to the arrangement of a first date and include the user profile management: choosing the username, making and selecting the pictures, writing the and the advertisement etc. In the USA, the website makes it possible to check whether the single have a criminal record.

In the UK, the dating site  · enables the coached dating to be initiated by a family member, a friend or a colleague.

Moreover, it should be noted that the websites like · permit the internaut to submit his pictures to the visitors.

Not a long time ago, various websites were available on the Internet with access to valuable tips on how to find a partner, and especially focused on how to find women. Dating Internet services have expanded and are now offering many more services to make it easier for people to find a .

In June 2010, published an article on a new service Internet dating companies are offering: online dating assistants. Dating companies offer the services of to help busy people find dates via the Internet.

The services start by helping customers build their profile, a practice already offered by several online dating sites. However, the service continues with picking out potential matches, the writer then sends introductory e-mails to the possible matches and continues messaging back and forth until they can confirm the date. Although the service was used at first mainly by men, this has changed with more women using this service as well.

Some of the larger online dating assistance and matchmaking companies include and, which guarantees dates to a worldwide clientele base.

This kind of service has been considered as misrepresentation and, thus ethically questionable, by those against it. However, some companies inform the online match that messages are being sent “on behalf of” a client.

Speed dating[]

Main article:

Speed dating consists in bringing previously selected people together for a short duration, typically seven dating of seven minutes. Amongst host websites with highest audience, there are and in France, in Canada, and in the UK, and in the USA.

Blind dating[]

Main article:

The company organize a «  » : the protagonists, previously selected in accordance with their assumed compatibilities, do not know each other ·  · . These kind of dating may be occur in group, for instance over a meal (in the USA, organizes meals for four women and four men sharing commonalities).

Group dating[]

Main article:

Some websites ( in the UK and in France, in Italy) are specialized in , a blind date inside a group of bachelors. This way of dating, particularly developed in Japan, may be related to a mix of blind dating (dating between singles) and slow dating (group outing).

Virtual dating[]

According to the model of the for , some applications have been developed to enable singles to be embodied in an and « meet » in a virtual space. In the , Prof. Michael I. Norton claimed that virtual dating could provide benefit in the assessment of one's compatibility with the other. In France, an example is the software Come in My World, seen as a mix of the OD service and the  · . It should also be noted that some websites ( « dating simulations » ) claim to provide gamers with the opportunity to make real encounters :, or even in France ·

Virtual dating combines online dating with online gaming. Virtual dating involves the use of for people to interact in a that resembles a real life dating environment. For example, individuals can meet and chat in a romantic virtual cafe in Paris or on a Caribbean resort. They can explore together, play games and take relationship quizzes to get a better, deeper understanding of each other. While online dating sites allows members to search on attributes such as education and income, virtual dating allows users to explore compatibility, sense of humor and rapport. Virtual dating sites include Weopia and Omnidate.

According to , virtual dating is "the next step in online dating" (Feb/March 2007, p. 35).

A magazine article entitled "Internet Dating 2.0" was published on January 19, 2007, citing current and upcoming technologies and explains how people can now connect in a virtual dating environment. Time describes how websites are allowing people to meet for an avatar based, graphically enabled virtual date without leaving their homes.

Researchers at MIT and Harvard have found that "people who had had a chance to interact with each other (by computer only) on a virtual tour of a museum subsequently had more successful face-to-face meetings than people who had viewed only profiles".

These experience has reported more registrations from than . One explanation for this phenomenon is that virtual dating allows women to have complete control over who they select and how they interact. Virtual dating also eliminates large amounts of emails in women's inboxes and allows women to enjoy a friendly dating option.

Dating by exchange of correspondence[]

There are some websites that offer to meet in an epistolary way (

A card for a romantic rendez-vous[]

The websites ( and .com in the USA) provide the subscriber with a pack of black cards he passes or makes pass to the one his heart desires in a party, in a café, at the restaurant or on public transport. The latter, by using the identifier on the card, will be able to consult the online message sent to her (invitation for a romantic rendez-vous, declaration of love). This way of approaching has the advantage for the subscriber that his choices are not limited to people registered on the OD websites.

Charity dating[]

Main article:

On the basis of where a celebrity charity auctions a date with her · , the website enables to sell a date to the highest bidder ; the money collected is then donated to charities · .

Slow dating[]

Taking the time to meet in the rather behind a computer can be preferred. « Slow dating » is a used to name the way of encountering offered by the websites treated to organize and/or to take part in a group outing/event/activity, whether it is a cultural, sport or just leisure activity. « Slow dating websites » can be generalist (no mather the outing) or specialized in a kind of outing/activity (sport, restaurant, trip etc.) ; moreover, they can be friend oriented (like ) or love oriented (,, Les-CoVoyageurs etc.).

Generalist slow dating websites : outing and encountering[]

identifies itself as « a site of friendly outings in your city ». With a wide range of kinds of outings offered (, , , , , , , etc.), OVS is the leader among friendly outings websites in France, in front of (that also enables to organize professional meetings) · . The leader in the USA is .

Furthermore, the outings websites can be romantic oriented: in addition to .fr or , which organize parties between bachelors, there are also in France · , (for gays); in the UK ; in the USA, enables the singles to meet from a common desired outing ·  ·  · .

Slow dating websites specialized per kind of outing/activity[]
Having dinner and encountering[], or suggest to encounter over a meal ; on, or, encountering is not necessarily reserved for singles who search for their soul mates but also everybody who wants to widen the scope of their acquaintances.

Hiking and encountering[]

In France, the website proposes hiking activities between singles.

Doing sport and encountering[]

Some websites suggests to encounter during sport activities : in France ; and in Canada ; in the USA and in the UK.

Practicing foreign languages and encountering[]

The language exchange website permits to find pen pals so as to improve general foreign language skills and to find new friends. Taking part in a is also possible. is addressed to those who want to meet new people worldwide.

Travelling and encountering[]

Somes websites are specialized in travelling for bachelors ( in France ; in Canada).

Housing tourists and encountering[]
Main article:

From the , some sites has been developed in the «  »: .org · , .org, , or Some of them emphasize the intercultural exchanges: and  · , whereas others are specialized for (, (, or also ( or speakers (

Meeting strangers by these websites implies exposure to .

Ads online dating service for professionals Social networking[] Online dating service - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Research about social networking reveals that the online dating services driven by subscriptions offer the least amount of social networking opportunities. They often only utilize the personal homepage genre of online community, which only makes them effective for the bonding and encoding stage of the relationship. The dating services modeled on the free-at-the-point-of-use model scored much higher as many of them utilized the Circle of Friends social networking method and a wider number of online community genres. The highest scoring dating service was , which uses the personal homepage genre, the message board genre, the weblog and directory genre, as well as utilizing the Circle of Friends. The second highest scoring, utilizes virtual worlds, message boards, chat groups and profile pages to allow people to contact in a three-dimensional environment. More recently, the impact of social networking on online dating has been featured on the Questia online research website peer reviewed article ""I Luv U :)!": A Descriptive Study of the Media Use of Individuals in Romantic Relationships" In comparison to and Second Life, there are other popular platforms that rank in the top 15 social networks. The most popular platforms are , , and . Apart from the popular social networks, there are social websites meant just for meeting and talking to someone new. 3 popular and effective websites are: , , and (where you can meet someone that has a similar taste in music as you).

Ads online dating service for professionals Problems[] Online dating service - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

A German documentary analyzed the market and uncovered multiple problems of online dating sites. Amongst them are "romance-scamming" (persons registering on the sites to get money from people falling in virtual love with them), using controllers or animators registered with multiple fake accounts, using unexpected and sometimes unlawful conditions in the terms and conditions leading to longer contracts a client intended to sign. In Germany government financed NGOs like "Verbraucherschutzzentrale" sometimes help to sue online dating sites. This problem is referred to as "catfishing" in pop-culture and has been made famous by a popular MTV program called "Catfish the TV show". Hosts Nev Schulam and Max Joseph Search out potential couples who have only had online correspondence but have never met in person. The show is based on finding these "catfish" and exposing them for fakes or finding out that the mystery person is actually real. This is a relevant issue because as much as 54% of people have lied and/or used fake pictures in their online dating profiles. The web has had a reputation as a place where anonymity is permitted. However, social networking sites tend to encourage greater degrees of transparency. Users are required to create a profile, which helps to establish an online identity. Over time a user's sum total of online activities paint a picture of who that user may be but we don't always question this information. We tend to forget that we see what others want us to see when it comes to crafting an identity.

Self-branding and its effects[]

Following the introduction of online dating sites such as .com and .com, a growing trend of self-branding has sparked to compensate for the rise in digital connectivity. This developed from the new networked age of dominant technological behaviors as defined by Yochai Benkler's theory on the networked information economy. Based on Benkler's theory, the new networked information economy “has created new opportunities for how we make and exchange information, knowledge and culture” (Benkler 2). It is from this new ability to be internationally connected by new forms of communication technology that this specific niche of the online dating service community came about and flourished. .com is an example of the effect of this international hyper-connectivity in which users all must brand themselves in a specific way to get whatever they are looking for; in this case, a relationship. It requires users to brand themselves as products that other users would potentially want to buy or more accurately get to know better based on how they market themselves differently than every other individual looking for companionship on the site. Adam Arvidsson outlines the methodology in which people must all separate themselves from one another but still be undeniably homogenized in behavior: “You need to stand out and be different while remaining compatible with everybody else” ). Marwick argues about the effects of self-branding on the individual to cope with this need to market ourselves: "Self- branding, the strategic creation of an identity to be promoted and sold to others" (Marwick 166). is typically thought of as referring to the selling of a product, when in this case of online dating it refers to the commoditization of an individual for gaining the attention of another for a possible new relationship. This poses ethical questions of how one can accurately portray one's entire personality and life experience into a set word limit. The Huffington Post suggests the importance of self-branding in the modern day "Everyone, whether you recognize it or not, already has a 'personal brand.' Remember, if you don't brand yourself, others will do it for you." Self-branding defines who we[] are and who we want others to think we are. recognizes the social rules of self-branding and its importance on online dating in which one must appear professional yet fun.

Pay dating business model[]

Online dating sites illustrate how the modern world centers around a money economy, as individuals are in essence able to buy love. Although some sites offer free trials and/or profiles, most memberships can cost upwards of $60 per month, and many individuals buy into the promise that these websites advertise: that they will find a user love that cannot be attained out in the real world. Thus, the main premise of online dating sites is to find one's "perfect match"—the person whom one will inevitably fall in love with and thus, spend the rest of your life with. In order to find this person, they use various questions, scales and polls to find someone who they deem to be compatible with you. For many individuals, this precise calculation of determining suitable matches offers an implied higher degree of success and eliminates the need to look for new relationships outside the home, consequently saving time and energy. Online dating sites have taken advantage of the modern individual's desire to save time in their hectic life in order to successfully commercialize their product in our capital-based society.[]

In an editorial post titled "Why you should never pay for online dating", a founder of free dating site .com criticized pay-dating as exploiting users and as "fundamentally broken", and noting that "pay sites have a unique [financial] incentive to profit from their customers' disappointment". The post analyzed the business model used for pay dating and noted that it gave rise to "strange incentives [because] the only way they don't make money is to show subscribers to other subscribers." (emphasis in original)

Abundance of information[]

Through the abundance of information on online dating profiles, as well as elsewhere on the Internet, people may already possess much superficial information about their potential partner's interests before talking to them, which may lead to a false sense of security when meeting up with a new person.


is a large component[] of online dating profiles. In a 2008 study, many participants stated that they often found themselves scrutinizing over what to write in their description and private messages, often first composing the piece on a word processing document to ensure proper spelling. Participants reported explicitly considering how they would be perceived by others, deeply analyzing themselves in order to appeal to others. This type of careful manipulation and scrutiny is made possible through modern technology—it is much easier to carefully plan out what you type rather than what you say.

A problematic component of online dating is the ease of lying it allows for, due to the anonymity of the Internet. Many stories have involved someone meeting up with a new online partner, only to find they look nothing like their profile photo. Often, online daters find it difficult to balance “accuracy and desirability in self-presentation”. One of the main processes behind social interactions include the packaging and portrayal of one's self to make favourable impressions upon others; online dating is no exception to this impression management. Individuals are concerned about how to present their own identity to attract partners, since they know their profile will be deeply scrutinized by others; thus, they often try to display the best photos of themselves and describe themselves in favourable ways to portray themselves in the best possible light to attract the most number of people. In one study, it was found that nine out of ten participants had lied on at least one attribute; weight was the most lied about attribute, and age was the least lied about. Often the lies are slight, but these still illustrate the difference that new media has created in relationships.

Recently, new online dating services have been created specifically for those living with HIV and other STI in an effort to eliminate the need to lie about one's health in order to find a partner. These website help to protect both parties involved in online dating.

Effects on dating[]

The increased use of online dating websites and services, thanks to a greater sense of acceptance by the mainstream, reinforces the “hyper-casual approach” to dating through the large number of potential dates that arise,[] which can cause people to have a sense of “FOMO” (fear of missing out), thus choosing to enlist a speed-dating approach in order to cycle through potential mates quickly. Often, this leads to much more casual dates than would have occurred previously, mirroring “online job applications [allowing] you [to] target many people simultaneously—it’s like darts on a dart board, eventually one will stick”.

User problems[]

There can be a variety of problems when using online dating sites.

  • Some sites offer members to subscribe "blind", meaning that users have little or no ability to search or preview the available profiles before they pay the subscription fee.
  • Many sites make confusing or willfully misleading claims to provide "free" advertisements. It might be "free to place an ad" (in which the users contact info is censored) but it's often not free to read and reply to the ad, or it's not free to retrieve those replies. The end result is a collection of abandoned profiles created by users who created the "free" ad before realizing they could do nothing else for free; the user leaves, the ad remains.
  • For paying members, it is often unclear whether a potential contact has a full subscription and whether he or she will be able to reply. Some sites prevent a potential contact from even reading a paying member's messages unless the contact has also paid to subscribe. There are, however, a few established dating sites that allow non-paid-up users to reply to messages, especially internally focused sites where there is an expected disparity of income.
  • Some sites require that both the sender and recipient of messages be subscribers before any off-site communication or contact can be arranged, and will filter messages to remove email addresses, telephone numbers, web addresses and surnames. Subscribers who attempt to circumvent this restriction may lose their membership and be removed from the site.
  • Some profiles may not represent actual daters, but are "bait profiles" that have been placed there by the site owners to attract new paying members. Both and have received several complaints about this tactic. Some users spam sites with "fake" profiles that are in reality advertisements to other services, such as prostitution, , or other personals websites. BBC and Kiev Post have investigated Cupid PLC for this issue.
  • Even when members' profiles are "real", there is still an inherent lack of trust with other members. Married people seeking affairs will often pose as singles. In addition, many members misrepresent themselves by telling flattering 'white lies' about their height, weight and age, or by using old and misleading photos. Members can ask for an up-to-date photograph before arranging a meeting, but disappointments are common. are a variant of online dating sites, and these are geared towards meeting people for the purpose of getting married. Gross misrepresentation is less likely on these sites than on casual dating sites.[] Casual dating sites are often geared more towards short term (potentially sexual) relationships.
  • find online dating sites especially attractive, because such sites give them an unending supply of new targets of opportunity for . A 2007 study, led by Dr. Paige Padgett from the , found that there was a false degree of safety assumed by women looking for love on the Internet, exposing them to , , and . Some online dating sites conduct on their members in an attempt to avoid problems of this nature but some don't. For those who had actually used online dating, 43 percent thought that online dating involved risk, although just over 50 percent did not see it as a dangerous activity. Media coverage of crimes related to online dating may also contribute to people’s perceptions of the risks of online dating.
  • Most members are enticed to join dating websites with free or low-priced "trial" memberships advertised on many other websites. On sites which require credit card information to join at all, these trial memberships may automatically become full memberships at the end of the trial period and charge the full monthly fee, without any additional action from the member, regardless of whether the member has actually used the services or not.
  • Some members have expressed complaints about the billing practices of certain dating sites. In some cases, trial memberships that were canceled within the trial period were automatically re-billed even after canceling. To avoid these potential problems, some users have advised using a virtual credit card number which is offered by several credit card companies.
  • On any given dating site, the is commonly unbalanced. A website may have two women for every man, but they may be in the 35+ range, while the men are generally under 35. Little is known about the sex ratio controlled for age. .coms membership is about 57% female and 43% male, whereas the ratio at is about the reverse of that. When one gets into the specialty niche websites where the primary demographic is male, one typically gets a very unbalanced ratio of male to female or female to male. Niche sites cater to people with special interests, such as sports fans, racing and automotive fans, medical or other professionals, people with political or religious preferences (e.g., Hindu, Jewish, Christian, Muslim, etc.), people with medical conditions (e.g., HIV+, obese), or those living in rural farm communities.
  • Studies have suggested that men are far more likely to send messages on dating sites than are women. In addition, that men tend to message the most attractive women regardless of their own attractiveness. This leads to the most attractive women on these sites receiving an overwhelming number of messages, which can result in them leaving the site.
  • There is some evidence that there may be a difference on how women online rate male attractiveness as opposed to how men rate female attractiveness. The distribution of ratings given by men of female attractiveness appears to look like a standard bell curve (normal distribution), while ratings of men given by women is highly skewed with 80% of the men rated as below average. This shows women are genuinely more picky than men when it comes to online dating. It could also potentially arise from women assessing other profile characteristics besides appearance, like their occupation.
  • Online dating makes the assumption that the users know what they're looking for in a potential partner. However, research has suggested that this may not be entirely accurate. As one of the co-founders of , , stated, "People appear to be heavily preselecting online for something that, once they sit down in person, doesn’t seem important to them".
  • Consolidation within the online dating industry has led to different newspapers and magazines now advertising the same website data base under different names. In the UK, for example, ("London Dating"), ("Encounters"), and ("Kindred Spirits"), all offer differently named portals to the same service—meaning that a person who subscribes through more than one publication has unwittingly paid more than once for access to just one site.
  • In December 2010, a New York State Law called the "Internet Dating Safety Act" (S5180-A) went into effect that requires online dating sites with customers in New York State to warn users not to disclose personal information to people they do not know.


groups have complained that certain websites that restrict their dating services to heterosexual couples are discriminating against . Homosexual customers of the popular .com dating website have made many attempts to litigate discriminatory was sued in 2007 by a claiming that, "Such outright discrimination is hurtful and disappointing for a business open to the public in this day and age". In light of discrimination by sexual orientation by dating websites, some services such as and cater more to homosexual dating.

In addition, many sites require members to specify what sex they are looking for without having the option "both", which complicates things for . Many sites also require members to specify themselves as "male" or "female", complicating matters for people as well as some persons with conditions.

Less than half of Internet daters are open to dating people of all races. Consistent with social exchange and group position theories, Asians, Latinos and blacks are more open to dating whites than whites are to dating them. Of those who state a racial preference, 97% of white men exclude black women, 48% exclude Latinas, and 53% exclude Asian women. In contrast, white men are excluded by 76% of black women, 33% Latinas, and only 11% Asian women. Similarly, 92% of white women exclude black men, 77% exclude Latinos, and 93% exclude Asian men. 71% of black men, 31% of Latinos, and 36% of Asian men excluded white women.

Misleading advertising[]

A 2011 class action lawsuit alleged failed to remove inactive profiles, did not accurately disclose the number of active members, and does not police its site for fake profiles; the inclusion of expired and spam profiles as valid served to both artificially inflate the total number of profiles and camouflage a skewed gender ratio in which active users were disproportionately single males. The suit claimed up to 60 percent were inactive profiles, fake or fraudulent users. Some of the spam profiles were alleged to be using images of porn actresses, models, or people from other dating sites. Former employees alleged Match routinely and intentionally over-represented the number of active members on the website and a huge percentage were not real members but 'filler profiles'.

A 2012 class action against ended with a November 2014 jury award of $1.4 million in compensatory damages and $15 million in punitive operated a dating site for people with STDs, .com, which it advertised as offering a “fully anonymous profile” which is “100% confidential”. The company failed to disclose that it was placing those same profiles on a long list of affiliate site domains such as,,,,,,, and This falsely inferred the same users as black, Christian, gay, HIV-positive or members of other groups with which the registered members did not identify. The jury found .com guilty of fraud, malice, and oppression as the plaintiffs' race, sexual orientation, HIV status, and religion were misrepresented by exporting each dating profile to niche sites associated with each trait.

In 2013, a former employee sued adultery website claiming repetitive strain injuries as creating 1000 fake profiles in one three week span "required an enormous amount of keyboarding" which caused the worker to develop severe pain in her wrists and forearms. parent company, Avid Life Media countersued in 2014, alleging the worker kept confidential documents, including copies of her "work product and training materials." The firm claimed the fake profiles were for "quality assurance testing" to test a new Brazilian version of the site for "consistency and reliability."

In January 2014, an already-married user attempting to close a pop-up advertisement for found that one click instead copied personal info from her Facebook profile to create an unwanted online profile seeking a mate, leading to a flood of unexpected responses from amorous single males.

In 2014, It's Just Lunch International was the target of a New York class action alleging as IJL staff relied on a uniform, misleading script which informed prospective customers during initial interviews that IJL already had at least two matches in mind for those customers' first dates regardless of whether or not that was true.

In 2014, the US fined UK-based JDI Dating (a group of 18 websites, including and over 600000, finding that "the defendants offered a free plan that allowed users to set up a profile with personal information and photos. As soon as a new user set up a free profile, he or she began to receive messages that appeared to be from other members living nearby, expressing romantic interest or a desire to meet. However, users were unable to respond to these messages without upgrading to a paid membership. Membership plans cost from $10 to $30 per month, with subscriptions generally ranging from one to 12 months. The messages were almost always from fake, computer-generated profiles — 'Virtual Cupids' — created by the defendants, with photos and information designed to closely mimic the profiles of real people." The FTC also found that paid memberships were being renewed without client authorisation.

Ads online dating service for professionals Comparisons in marriage health: traditional versus online first encounters[] Online dating service - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

According to a study commissioned by .com and conducted by a paid scientific adviser to the company, more than a third of marriages between 2005 and 2012 began online, and these marriages tend to be happier and longer than marriages of offline couples. The study did not determine why this was the case. The study was conducted by expert . Cacioppo examined the results of a 19,131 person survey about their marriages and satisfaction. Respondents of the survey who met online tended to be somewhat older (30-39), employed, and with a relatively higher income. The results were published in the paper "Marital Satisfaction and Differ Across Online and Offline Meeting Venues”, in the . The results of the study suggest that the and may be altering the dynamics and outcomes of marriage.

The emergence of dating sites who promote adultery, such as , stirred some controversy. Marriage breakups happened in about 6% of online couples, compared to 7.6% of offline ones. Mean marital satisfaction scores were 5.64 and 5.48 for the online and offline couples, respectively.

Ads online dating service for professionals Government regulation[] Online dating service - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

U.S. government regulation of dating services began with the (IMBRA) which took effect in March 2007 after a federal judge in Georgia upheld a challenge from the dating site European Connections. The law requires dating services meeting specific criteria—including having as their primary business to connect U.S. citizens/residents with foreign nationals—to conduct, among other procedures, sex offender checks on U.S. customers before contact details can be provided to the non-U.S. citizen.

In the People's Republic of China, transnational matchmaking is illegal. The prohibits the business of organizing or facilitating marriages between Filipinas and foreign men under the (the Anti-Mail-Order Bride Law) of June 13, 1990; this law is routinely circumvented by basing websites outside the country.

Singapore's government has actively acted as a matchmaker for singles for the past few decades, and thus only 4% of Singaporeans have ever used an online dating service, despite the country’s high rate of internet penetration. Singapore's is the governmental organization facilitating dating activities in the country. There are, however, private, faith-based online dating services developed by Singaporeans.

New Jersey became the first state to enact a law requiring the sites to disclose whether they perform background checks.

There are several sites that already offer the option for users to request background checks including is now offering screenings for sex offenders to their users.

Ads online dating service for professionals Online introduction services[] Online dating service - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

In 2008 a variation of the online dating model emerged in the form of introduction sites, attracting a large number of users and significant investor interest. Introduction sites differ from the traditional online dating model, where members have to search and contact other members, by introducing members to other members whom they deem compatible, thus claiming to eliminate much of the mayhem of traditional online dating. Although the two introduction services operate differently and offer different features, both claim to be more effective than traditional online personals.[]

Ads online dating service for professionals Free dating[] Online dating service - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Most free dating websites depend on revenue, using tools such as , . Since advertising revenues are modest compared to membership fees, free dating sites require a large number of to achieve profitability. However, Sam Yagan (founder of .com and current CEO of describes dating sites as ideal advertising platforms because of the wealth of demographic data made available by users. "You give us data, we give you dates", says Yagan.

Other partially free online dating services offer only limited privileges for free members, or only a brief free period; generally, advanced features such as virtual gifts are available to paying users only.

Ads online dating service for professionals In popular culture[] Online dating service - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

  • , a 1998 film in which the two protagonists conduct a relationship entirely over e-mail before meeting each other
  • , a 2004 film in a which one subplot involves a central character's online (and later in-person) relationship
  • , a 2004 film in which the central character has a relationship wholly via email with a girl from Berlin
  • , a 2005 film about two people trying to find love through online dating
  • , a 2007 film in which a mother creates an online dating profile for her daughter
  • , a 2008 film about a young man who goes on a cross-country roadtrip with friends to meet his internet crush, and woo her with his brother's stolen GTO.
  • , a play which revolves around Jewish dating service .com
  • , a 2010 documentary film in which a group of men travel to Ukraine on a romance tour arranged by online dating service .

Ads online dating service for professionals See also[] Online dating service - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Ads online dating service for professionals References[] Online dating service - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

  1. Heino, R.; N. Ellison; J. Gibbs (2010). "Relationshopping: Investigating the market metaphor in online dating.". : 427–447. 
  2. Brian Anthony Hernandez 7 (2011-12-13). . Retrieved 2012-07-17. 
  3. Kang, Tanya; Lindsay H. Hoffman (2011). "Why Would You Decide to Use an Online Dating Site? Factors That Lead to Online Dating". 28 (3): 205. :. 
  4. Brian Boyd (2007-09-16). . Retrieved 2014-01-02. 
  5. Ansari, Aziz; Klinenberg, Eric (2015-06-16). . Penguin Press.  . 
  6. . Computer World. 2009-02-13. Retrieved 2014-01-02. 
  7. . CNN. 2010-04-14. Retrieved 2010-05-20. 
  8. ^ Sullivan, J. Courtney. . New York Times. Retrieved 2006-04-28. 
  9. . Tech Crunch. Retrieved 2006-04-24. 
  10. . Network World. Retrieved 2008-02-07. 
  11. . 2010-02-05. Retrieved 2014-01-02. 
  12. . 2009-02-26. Retrieved 2014-01-02. 
  13. . 2009-11-17. Retrieved 2014-01-02. 
  14. Mary Madden, Research Specialist, Amanda Lenhart, Senior Research Specialist (September 2005). . Pew Internet & American Life Project. Retrieved 2010-12-08. Online daters tend to identify with more liberal social attitudes, compared with all Americans or all internet users. 
  15. ^ The OD websites given in example in the article are displayed in descendant sort according to the rank of . Update : 2014.
  16. . Retrieved 2016-05-16. 
  17. , , 07/03/2008
  18. LDS =
  19. , , 12/02/2008
  20. , , 15/04/2009
  21. , , 21/02/2011
  22. , , 18/02/2009
  23. Nelson, Rebecca (February 11, 2016). . . . Retrieved March 27, 2016. 
  24. , , 20/07/2009
  25. , , 15/04/2011
  26. , , 12/04/2011
  27. , , 11/05/2012
  28. , , 24/10/2012
  29. , , 02/10/2012
  30. , , 14/02/2010
  31. , , 23/02/2011
  32. , , 05/06/2009
  33. , , 15/07/2008
  34. , , 28/03/2014
  35. Susan Rabin and Barbara Lagowski, , 25/10/2005
  36. Yuppie = Young Urban Professional
  37. , , 16/04/ 2013
  38. , , 08/02/2012
  39. , , 07/01/2012
  40. , , 23/02/2011
  41. , , 11/10/2012
  42. ^ , , 02/06/2011
  43. , , 23/02/2011
  44. , , 28/11/2013
  45. , , 30/04/2012
  46. Brian VASZILY, , 2011
  47. , , 25/09/2013
  48. , , 3 October 2013
  49. Rebecca A. FANNIN, , 09/12/2011
  50. . 
  51. , , 14/02/2011
  52. , , March 2013
  53. , , 13/02/2013
  54. , , 12/02/2011
  55. , , seen the 04/05/2014
  56. ^ , , 07/02/2011
  57. , , 04/04/2014
  58. , , 19/03/2014
  59. , , retrieved 2015/07/01
  60. ^ , , 03/06/2012
  61. , , 20/04/2011
  62. ^ , , 10/07/2006
  63. , , 30/12/2013
  64. , , 17/09/2009
  65. , , 02/02/2010
  66. , , 22/07/2008
  67. , , 22/07/2008
  68. , , 17/12/2007
  69. , , 23/10/2009
  70. , , 31/01/2011
  71. , , 04/09/2011
  72. , , 26/02/2014
  73. , , 04/02/2014
  74. , 11/03/2012
  75. , , 15/01/2011
  76. , , December 2013
  77. , , 13/05/2014
  78. , , 21/04/2011
  79. , , 21/04/2011
  80. , , 05/05/2014
  81. , , accessed 27/06/2014
  82. , , 05/08/2013
  83. , , accessed 27/06/2014
  84. , accessed 27/06/2014
  85. , accessed 27/06/2014
  86. , , 26/11/2007
  87. , , 07/04/ 2014
  88. , accessed 27/06/2014
  89. , , 15/11/2013
  90. , , 15/03/2013
  91. , , 04/02/2013
  92. ^ , , 13/02/2012
  93. , , 06/05/2013
  94. Also called «  ».
  95. Dossie EASTON & Janet W. HARDY, , Ten Speed Press, 1997
  96. , , 18/02/2007
  97. refers here to rather than . Conerning polyandric OD websites, see .
  98. , 18/06/2013
  99. , , 13/02/2014
  100. , , 06/07/2012
  101. , , 06/05/2012
  102. Dominique AUZIAS and Jean-Paul LABOURDETTE, , , March 2012
  103. Kevin ALDERSON, , Idiomatic, September 2000
  104. , , 18/08/2012
  105. ABDL =
  106. ^ , , 07/05/2013
  107. French website for HIV-seropositive barebakers.
  108. According to the , the (female) cougar equivalent for male is « rhino », « manther » (man/panther), « dirty old man », « trout » or even « cheetah » .
  109. According to the , the female equivalent is .
  110. , , 01/05/2011
  111. , , April 2014
  112. , , 25/03/2014
  113. , , 04/04/2014
  114. , , 18/02/2013
  115. , , 22/07/2013
  116. , , 13/07/2012
  117. , , 12/04/2011
  118. , , 19/04/2011
  119. , , accessed 03/05/2014
  120. , , 29/04/2014
  121. , , 11/06/2011
  122. , , 26/04/2013
  123. , , 06/06/2013
  124. , , 29/11/2011
  125. , , 16/01/2013
  126. , , 02/12/2009
  127. , , 14/05/2007
  128. , , 23/08/2010
  129. , , 22/08/2010
  130. , , 28/11/2013
  131. = Big Beautiful Woman
  132. , , 03/11/2008
  133. = Big Handsome Men
  134. = Super-Size BBW
  135. , , 30/06/2015
  136. , , 01/07/2015
  137. , , 24/06/2014
  138. , , 23/06/2014
  139. , , 24/06/2014
  140. , , April 2012
  141. , , 11/05/2013
  142. , , 30/10/2013
  143. , , 05/12/2011
  144. , , 31/08/2014
  145. , , 31/12/2013
  146. , , 14/04/2010
  147. , , 06/02/2009
  148. , , 02/10/2013
  149. . foreignsinglesfinder. Retrieved 27 October 2015. 
  150. , , 27/11/2012
  151. , , 11/06/2013
  152. Ansari, Aziz (2015). Modern Romance. New York: Penguin Press. p. 79. 
  153. Ansari, Aziz (2015). Modern Romance. New York: Penguin Press. p. 179. 
  154. , , 14/12/2011
  155. , , 06/05/2013
  156. , , 30/04/2014
  157. , , 02/10/2014
  158. , , 04/04/2014
  159. , , 31/08/2012
  160. , , 07/10/2014
  161. , , 14/12/2011
  162. , , 18/12/2010
  163. , , 22/08/2013
  164. , , 12/10/2014
  165. , , 06/09/2004
  166. , , July 2003
  167. . CNN. 2010-01-21. Retrieved 2010-06-23. 
  168. McCarthy, Ellen (2010-06-01). . The Washington Post. Retrieved 2010-06-23. 
  169. NaviMag, , 12/01/2010
  170. William PRIDE, O. C. FERRELL, , 02/01/2011
  171. Ned KOCK, , 19/08/2010
  172. Ellie Slott FISHER, Paul D. HALPERN, , 29/01/2008
  173. , Blind Date : Sexe and philosophie, , 2003
  174. , , 30/10/2013
  175. , , 13/11/2013
  176. , , 03/05/2013
  177. , , 31/03/2011
  178. , , , February/March 2007
  179. , , 18/04/2008
  180. , , 19/11/2008
  181. . Retrieved 4 January 2010. . 
  182. ^ Epstein, Robert (2013-12-19). . Retrieved 2014-01-02. 
  183. . Time. 2007-01-19. Retrieved 2010-05-20. 
  184. , , 17/03/2013
  185. , , 20/08/2012
  186. , , 03/03/2008
  187. , , 27/11/2011
  188. , , 28/06/2012
  189. , , 21/02/2012
  190. ^ , , 23/01/2011
  191. , , 11/06/2013
  192. , , 14/02/2013
  193. , , 01/03/2014
  194. , , 11/02/2014
  195. , , 06/04/2014
  196. , , 05/11/2013
  197. , , 20/03/2013
  198. Christophe DESHAYES, Jean-Baptiste STUCHLIK, , Broché, 20/02/2013
  199. , , 10/03/2014,
  200. , , 14/02/2014
  201. , , 20/05/2013
  202. , , 15/04/2014
  203. , , 09/01/2012
  204. , , 26/07/2013
  205. Dominique AUZIAS, Jean-Paul LABOURDETTE, , 06/12/2013
  206. , , 25/10/2013
  207. , , 09/02/2011
  208. , , 13/06/2012
  209. Rebecca A. FANNIN, , 09/12/2011
  210. , , 22/10/2014
  211. , , 22/08/2012
  212. , , 19/04/2008
  213. ^ Anick Marie BOUCHARD, Guillaume CHARROIN and Nans THOMASSEY, , 03/07/2014
  214. , , 08/09/2014
  215. , , 06/09/2014
  216. Bishop, J. (2008b). Understanding and facilitating the development of social networks in online dating communities: A case study and model. In C. Romm-Livermore, & K. Setzekorn (Eds.), Social networking communities and EDating services: Concepts and implications. New York: IGI Global,
  217. . 
  218. Milanovic, Randy (April 13, 2016). . 
  219. , , 2014-07-21.
  220. Benkler, Yochai. (PDF). New Haven and London: Yale University Press. pp. 1–10. 
  221. (Arvidsson 120
  222. Arvidsson, Adam (1 February 2014). . Ephemera: Theory & Politics in Organization. 14 (1): 119–124. 
  223. Marwick, Alice E. (PDF). Steinhardt School of Culture, Education, and Human Development, New York University. pp. 160–175. 
  224. Cayla, Julien; Arnould, Eric J. (November 4, 2008). "A Cultural Approach to Branding in the Global Marketplace". Journal of International Marketing 16: 86–112. :. 
  225. A.M. Phillips, Collette (April 19, 2014). . Huffington Post. 
  226. Jones, Cher (March 16, 2014). . Linkedin. 
  227. . Retrieved 2013-03-17. 
  228. (2010-04-07). . OkTrends. Archived from on 2010-10-06. Retrieved 10 April 2011. 
  229. ^ Williams, Alex (2013-01-11). . The New York Times. 
  230. ^ Couch, Danielle; Pranee Liamputtong (2008). "Online Dating and Mating: The Use of the Internet to Meet Sexual Partners". Qualitative Health Research. 
  231. Ellison, Nicole; Rebecca Heino; Jennifer Gibbs (2006). "Managing impressions online: Self‐presentation processes in the online dating environment". Journal of Computer‐Mediated Communication 11 (2): 415–441. :. 
  232. ^ Hancock, Jeffrey (2007). "The truth about lying in online dating profiles". 
  233. Mazanderani, F. (2012). (PDF). BioSocieties 7 (4): 393–409. 
  234. . 
  235. . 2013-02-25. Retrieved 2014-01-02. 
  236. Couch, Danielle; Liamputtong, Pranee; Pitts, Marian (2011). “Online Daters and the Use of Technology for Surveillance and Risk Management”. International Journal of Emerging Technologies & Society 9 (2): p 116–134.
  237. . MuckRock. Retrieved 2015-12-14. 
  238. . Retrieved 2015-12-14. 
  239. . Retrieved 21 November 2007.
  240. . Jon Millward. Retrieved 2015-12-14. 
  241. Kreager, Derek A.; Cavanagh, Shannon E.; Yen, John; Yu, Mo (2014-04-01). . Journal of marriage and the family 76 (2): 387–410. :.  .  .  . 
  242. Christian Rudder. . OkTrends. 
  243. Ansari, Aziz; Klinenberg, Eric (2015-06-13). . The New York Times.  . Retrieved 2015-12-14. 
  244. . Retrieved 2014-01-02. 
  245. Buss, Dale (28 November 2008). . Wall Street Journal – Eastern Edition. Retrieved 31 October 2013. 
  246. . 
  247. Yancey, George (2009). "Cross racial differences in the racial preference of potential dating partners". : 121–143. 
  248. Robnett, Belinda; Feliciano, Cynthia (Mar2011). “Patterns of Racial-Ethnic Exclusion by Internet Daters.” Social Forces 89 (3): p 807–828.
  249. . WFAA TV. 4 January 2011. 
  250. . Dallas Business Journal. 4 January 2011. 
  251. John P. Mello, Jr. (5 January 2011). . CIO. 
  252. . Techdirt. 
  253. . KENS TV 5. 10 November 2013. 
  254. . Slate Magazine. 
  255. Elizabeth Flock. . US News & World Report. 
  256. . Out & About Nashville. 
  257. . TC Attorney. 
  258. . Herpes Dating. 
  259. . Aaron Kelly law firm. 
  260. XBIZ. . XBIZ. 
  261. . The Daily Dot. 
  262. . Canadian Broadcasting Corporation. 10 November 2013. 
  263. . Canadian Broadcasting Corporation. 23 March 2014. 
  264. Marchitelli, Rosa (24 November 2014). . . 
  265. . Reuters. 2014-05-14. 
  266. . CNET. 
  267. . US Federal Trade Commission. 
  268. . 29 October 2014. 
  269. . UChicago News. Retrieved 2014-01-02. 
  270. Aytes, Michael (July 21, 2006). (PDF). . Retrieved 2012-11-11. 
  271. 马玉佳 (2011-08-30). . Retrieved 2014-01-02. 
  272. . Retrieved 2013-04-16. 
  273. Nicole Constable (2003-08-19). . Retrieved 2013-04-16. 
  274. Mae Ryan (26 September 2012). . SCPR. Retrieved 9 December 2014. 
  275. . 
  276. . MSNBC. 2008-02-12. Retrieved 2014-01-02. 
  277. . CNN. 2011-04-19. 
  278. . VentureBeat. 2008-06-12. Retrieved 2014-01-02. 
  279. Levitt, Steven (2013-04-18). . Retrieved 2014-01-02. 

Ads online dating service for professionals Further reading[] Online dating service - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Retrieved from ""