Dating plattform

Statistics of black men dating white women Interracial marriage in the United States

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Juegos de citas 100 gratis
U.S States, by the date of repeal of Siti incontri a pagamento:
  No laws passed
  Before 1887
  1948 to 1967
  June 12, 1967

Qual o melhor site de relacionamento no brasil in the Site de relacionamento de fortaleza has been fully legal in all можно познакомиться нормальным мужчиной since the Rencontre guinee conakry that deemed Site de rencontre gratuit 21 unconstitutional, with many states choosing to legalize interracial marriage at earlier dates. Site rencontre amicale ado numbered 9.0 million in 2010, or 2.9% of the total population, but 5.6% of the population under age 18.Centre des rencontres creil The actual number is likely much higher, for example a study of college students identifying as white found that 30% had less than 90% European ancestry,Nouvelles rencontres handicapésSite de rencontre asiatique noir and one recent study found that African Americans have an average of 21% European ancestry.Club de rencontre gratuit a la reunion

Statistics of black men dating white women Cultural background Interracial marriage in the United States - Wikipedia, the free

The differing ages of individuals, culminating in the Is paula abdul dating arsenio hall divides, have traditionally played a large role in how Jessicas guide to dating on the dark side wiki couples are perceived in Joe nichols is dating playboy model society. Interracial marriages have typically been highlighted through two points of view in the United States: Looking for free dating sites without credit card in usa and Naples italy dating site bus schedule.Plenty of fish free dating sign in Egalitarianism's view of interracial marriage is acceptance of the phenomenon, while traditionalists view interracial marriage as Price comparison dating sites for energy and as socially unacceptable.Question to ask a man when dating Egalitarian viewpoints typically are held by younger generations, however older generations have an inherent influence on the views of the younger.Sparks online dating sites free for college students in india Gurung & Duong (1999) compiled a study relating to mixed-ethnic relationships ("MER"s) and same-ethnic relationships ("SER"s), concluding that individuals part of "MER"s generally do not view themselves differently from same-ethnic couples.Speed dating computer game 3 free

In Social Trends in America and Strategic Approaches to the Negro Problem (1948), Swedish economist Speed dating toronto for young adults uk ranked the social areas where restrictions were imposed on the freedom of The rules for texting and online dating by Top 1best dating sites in usa Totally free intimate dating services in portland or through Who is jesse mccartney dating right now, from the least to the most important: basic public facility access, social equality, jobs, courts and police, politics and marriage. This ranking scheme illustrates the manner in which the barriers against Who is zac dating right now fell: Of less importance was the segregation in basic public facilities, which was abolished with the Women seeking men for dating in pune. The most tenacious form of legal segregation, the banning of interracial marriage, was not fully lifted until the last Write a good online dating profile were struck down in 1967 by the ruling in the landmark case.

research conducted on behalf of the (2005–2007) showed that regional differences within the United States in how interracial relationships are perceived have persisted: Daters of both sexes from south of the were found to have much stronger same-race preferences than northern daters did. The study also observed a clear gender divide in racial preference with regards to marriage: Women of all the races which were studied revealed a strong preference for men of their own race for marriage, with the caveat that women only discriminated against Black and Hispanic men, and not against White men. A woman's race was found to have no effect on the men's choices.

Statistics of black men dating white women Socio-economic background Interracial marriage in the United States - Wikipedia, the free

Several studies have found that a factor which significantly affects an individual's choices with regards to marriage is ("SES")-- the measure of a person's income, education, social class, profession, etc. For example, a study by the Centre for Behaviour and Evolution, confirmed that women show a tendency to marry up in socio-economic status; this reduces the probability of marriage of low SES men.

Research at the universities of and addressing the topic of socio-economic status, among other factors, showed that none of the socio-economic status variables appeared to be positively related to outmarriage within the community, and found lower-socioeconomically stable Asians sometimes utilized outmarriage to as a means to advance social status.

Statistics of black men dating white women Marital instability among interracial and same-race couples Interracial marriage in the United States - Wikipedia, the free

A 2008 study by Jenifer L. Bratter and Rosalind B. King conducted on behalf of the examined whether crossing racial boundaries increased the risk of . Using the 2002 (Cycle VI), the likelihood of divorce for interracial couples to that of same-race couples was compared. Comparisons across marriage cohorts revealed that, overall, interracial couples have higher rates of divorce, particularly for those that married during the late 1980s. The authors found that gender plays a significant role in interracial divorce dynamics: According to the adjusted models predicting divorce as of the 10th year of marriage, interracial marriages that are the most vulnerable involve White females and non-White males relative to White/White couples. White wife/Black husband marriages are twice as likely to divorce by the 10th year of marriage compared to White/White couples, while White wife/Asian husband marriages are 59% more likely to end in divorce compared to White/White unions. Conversely, White men/non-White women couples show either very little or no differences in divorce rates. Asian wife/White husband marriages show only 4% greater likelihood of divorce by the 10th year of marriage than White/White couples. In the case of Black wife/White husband marriages, divorce by the 10th year of marriage is 44% less likely than among White/White unions. Intermarriages that did not cross a racial barrier, which was the case for White/Hispanic White couples, showed statistically similar likelihoods of divorcing as White/White marriages.

Statistics of black men dating white women Census Bureau statistics Interracial marriage in the United States - Wikipedia, the free

The number of interracial marriages has steadily continued to increase since the 1967 ruling in , but also continues to represent an absolute minority among the total number of wed couples. According to the , the number of interracially married couples has increased from 310,000 in 1970 to 651,000 in 1980, to 964,000 in 1990, to 1,464,000 in 2000 and to 2,340,000 in 2008; accounting for 0.7%, 1.3%, 1.8%, 2.6% and 3.9% of the total number of married couples in those years, respectively. These statistics do not take into account the mixing of ancestries within the same "race"; e.g. a marriage involving and ancestries would not be classified as interracial due to the Census regarding both as the same category. Likewise, since is not a race but an , Hispanic marriages with non-Hispanics are not registered as interracial if both partners are of the same race (i.e. a marrying a non-Hispanic Black partner).

Married couples in the United States in 2010
White Wife Black Wife Asian Wife Other Wife
White Husband 50,410,000 97.7% 168,000 0.3% 529,000 1.0% 487,000 0.9%
Black Husband 390,000 8.6% 4,072,000 89.2% 39,000 0.9% 66,000 1.3%
Asian Husband 219,000 7.0% 9,000 0.3% 2,855,000 91.8% 28,000 0.9%
Other Husband 488,000 44.0% 18,000 1.6% 37,000 3.4% 568,000 51.0%

Based on these figures:

  • were statistically the least likely to wed interracially, though in absolute terms they were involved in interracial marriages more than any other racial group due to their demographic majority. 2.1% of married White women and 2.3% of married White men had a non-White spouse. 1.0% of all married White men were married to an woman, and 1.0% of married White women were married to a man classified as "other".
  • 4.6% of married women and 10.8% of married Black American men had a non-Black spouse. 8.5% of married Black men and 3.9% of married Black women had a White spouse. 0.2% of married Black women were married to Asian American men, representing the least prevalent marital combination.
  • There is a notable disparity in the rates of by Asian American males and females. Of all Asian American/White marriages, only 29% involved an Asian American male and a White female. However males had higher outmarriage for males than females, although Indian Americans displayed the highest rates of , with very low levels of outmarriage overall. Of all Asian American/Black marriages only 19% involved an Asian American male and a Black female. 17.5% of married Asian American women and 8.2% of married Asian American men had a non-Asian American spouse.

In 2006, 88% of foreign-born White Hispanic males were married to White Hispanic females. In terms of out-marriage, Hispanic males who identified as White had non-Hispanic wives more often than other Hispanic men.

2008 Pew Research Center Report (U.S. Census Bureau’s 2008 American Community Survey)

The table shows that among whites who out-married in 2008, there were different patterns by gender in the race of their spouses. More than a quarter of white men (26.9%) married an Asian woman, and about 6.9% married a black woman. In contrast, 20.1% of white women married a black man, while just 9.4% married an Asian man. A slightly higher proportion of white women than white men married a Hispanic person (51% versus 46%), and a similar share of each gender married someone in the other group.

Percentage of all new marriages in 2008
Who “Out-Married” by Race/Ethnicity of Spouse
Hispanic Black Asian Other
White Husband 46.1% 6.9% 26.9% 20.1%
White Wife 51.4% 20.1% 9.4% 19.1%
White Hispanic Asian Other
Black Husband 57.2% 21.9% 7.0% 13.9%
Black Wife 58.6% 24.2% 5.5% 11.6%
White Black Asian Other
Hispanic Husband 83.3% 4.5% 5.3% 7.0%
Hispanic Wife 77.5% 13.2% 4.0% 5.2%
White Black Hispanic Other
Asian Husband 70.9% 4.8% 17.7% 6.7%
Asian Wife 76.8% 7.2% 9.5% 6.6%
(%) Percentage of all New Marriages that are Interracial or Interethnic - 2008
“Newly married” refers to people who got married in the 12 months before the survey.
(Hispanics are an ethnic group, not a racial group. E.g.: , , )

The study found that in 2008:

  • A record 14.6% of all new marriages in the United States in 2008 were between spouses of a different race or ethnicity from one another. This compares to 8.0% of all current marriages regardless of when they occurred. This includes marriages between a Hispanic and non-Hispanic (Hispanics are an ethnic group, not a race) as well as marriages between spouses of different races – be they white, black, Asian, American Indian or those who identify as being of multiple races or some other race.
  • Among all newlyweds in 2008, 9% of whites, 16% of blacks, 26% of Hispanics and 31% of Asians married someone whose race or ethnicity was different from their own.
  • Among all newlyweds in 2008, intermarried pairings were primarily White-Hispanic (41%) as compared to White-Asian (15%), White-Black (11%), and Other Combinations (33%). Other combinations consists of pairings between different minority groups, multi-racial people, and American Indians.
  • Among all newlyweds in 2008, native-born Hispanics and Asians were far more likely to intermarry than foreign-born Hispanics and Asians: 41.3% of native-born Hispanic men out-married compared to 11.3% of foreign-born Hispanic men; 37.4% of native-born Hispanic women out-married compared to 12.2% of foreign-born Hispanic women; 41.7% of native-born Asian men out-married compared to 11.7% of foreign-born Asian men; 50.8% of native-born Asian women out-married compared to 36.8% of foreign-born Asian women. Foreign-born excludes immigrants who arrived married.
  • Gender patterns in intermarriage vary widely. Some 22% of all black male newlyweds in 2008 married outside their race, compared with just 9% of black female newlyweds. Among Asians, the gender pattern runs the other way. Some 40% of Asian female newlyweds married outside their race in 2008, compared with just 20% of Asian male newlyweds. Among whites and Hispanics, by contrast, there are no gender differences in intermarriage rates.
  • Rates of intermarriages among newlyweds in the U.S. more than doubled between 1980 (6.7%) and 2008 (14.6%). However, different groups experienced different trends. Rates more than doubled among whites and nearly tripled among blacks. But for both Hispanics and Asians, rates were nearly identical in 2008 and 1980.
  • These seemingly contradictory trends were driven by the heavy, ongoing Hispanic and Asian immigration wave of the past four decades. For whites and blacks, these immigrants (and, increasingly, their U.S.-born children who are now of marrying age) have enlarged the pool of potential spouses for out-marriage. But for Hispanics and Asians, the ongoing immigration wave has also enlarged the pool of potential partners for in-group marriage.
  • There is a strong regional pattern to intermarriage. Among all new marriages in 2008, 22% in the West were interracial or interethnic, compared with 13% in both the South and Northeast and 11% in the Midwest.
  • Most Americans say they approve of racial or ethnic intermarriage – not just in the abstract, but in their own families. More than six-in-ten say it would be fine with them if a family member told them they were going to marry someone from any of three major race/ethnic groups other than their own.
  • More than a third of adults (35%) say they have a family member who is married to someone of a different race. Blacks say this at higher rates than do whites; younger adults at higher rates than older adults; and Westerners at higher rates than people living in other regions of the country.

2010 Pew Research Center Report (U.S. Census Bureau’s 2010 American Community Survey)

The study found that in 2010:

  • A record 15.1% of all new marriages in the United States were between spouses of a different race or ethnicity from one another. This compares to 8.4% of all current marriages regardless of when they occurred. This includes marriages between a Hispanic and non-Hispanic (Hispanics are an ethnic group, not a race) as well as marriages between spouses of different races – be they white, black, Asian, American Indian or those who identify as being of multiple races or some other race.
  • Among all newlyweds, 9.4% of whites, 17.1% of blacks, 25.7% of Hispanics and 27.7% of Asians married someone whose race or ethnicity was different from their own.
  • Among all newlyweds, intermarried pairings were primarily White-Hispanic (43.3%) as compared to White-Asian (14.4%), White-Black (11.9%), and Other Combinations (30.4%). Other combinations consists of pairings between different minority groups, multi-racial people, and American Indians.
  • Among all newlyweds, native-born Hispanics and Asians were far more likely to intermarry than foreign-born Hispanics and Asians: 36.2% of native-born Hispanics (both men and women) out-married compared to 14.2% of foreign-born Hispanics; 32% of native-born Asian men out-married compared to 11% of foreign-born Asian men; 43% of native-born Asian women out-married compared to 34% of foreign-born Asian women. Foreign-born excludes immigrants who arrived married.
  • Gender patterns in intermarriage vary widely. Some 24% of all black male newlyweds in 2010 married outside their race, compared with just 9% of black female newlyweds. Among Asians, the gender pattern runs the other way. Some 36% of Asian female newlyweds married outside their race in 2010, compared with just 17% of Asian male newlyweds. Among whites and Hispanics, by contrast, there are no gender differences in intermarriage rates.
  • Rates of intermarriages among newlyweds in the U.S. have nearly tripled since 1980 (6.7%) increasing to 14.6% in 2008 and 15.1% in 2010.
  • There is a strong regional pattern to intermarriage. Among all new marriages in 2010, 22% in the West were interracial or interethnic, compared with 14% in the South, 13% in the Northeast and 11% in the Midwest.

Statistics of black men dating white women Interracial marriage by pairing Interracial marriage in the United States - Wikipedia, the free

Asian and White

An Asian bride and White groom at their wedding (2004)

Marriages between and are increasingly common for both genders in the United States.

Asian Americans of both genders who are U.S.-raised are much more likely to be married to Whites than their non-U.S.-raised counterparts. Of all the Asian American groups studied, showed the highest rates of endogamy, with the overwhelming majority of Indian American women and men marrying Indian American partners. Indian Americans were also the only Asian American group with higher outmarriage for men, whereas all other Asian American groups had higher outmarriage for women. A 1998 article states 36% of young men born in the United States married White women, and 45% of U.S.-born Asian Pacific American women took White husbands during the year of publication.

According to social studies by Jenifer L. Bratter and Rosalind B. King (2009) gender plays a significant role in interracial dynamics. White wife/Asian husband couples are 59% more likely to divorce by the 10th year of marriage than White wife/White husband couples, whereas Asian wife/White husband couples show only 4% greater likelihood of divorce than White wife/White husband couples over the same period. research by the (2005–2007) concluded that while East Asian women statistically prefer East Asian men for marriage, they show no discrimination against White men, causing Asian women/White men pairings to consistently become the prevalent form of interracial dating & marriage in the United States.

Anti-miscegenation laws discouraging marriages between Whites and non-Whites were affecting Asian immigrants and their spouses from the late 17th to early 20th century. By 1910, 28 states prohibited certain forms of interracial marriage. Eight states including Arizona, California, Mississippi, Montana, Nevada, Oregon, Texas, and Utah extended their prohibitions to include people of Asian descent. The laws of Arizona, California, Mississippi, Texas, and Utah referred to "Mongolians". Asians in California were barred by anti-miscegenation laws from marrying (a group including ). Nevada and Oregon referred to "Chinese," while Montana listed both "Chinese" and "Japanese" persons. For example, a daughter born to an Indian father and mother in in 1680 was classified as a "" and sold into slavery, and the revolutionary 's white American wife, Mary K. Das, was stripped of her American citizenship for her marriage to an " ineligible for citizenship." In 1918, there was controversy in when an Indian farmer married the sixteen-year-old daughter of one of his White tenants. California law did not explicitly bar Filipinos and whites from marrying, a fact brought to wide public attention by the 1933 case ; however the legislature quickly moved to amend the laws to prohibit such marriages as well in the aftermath of the case.

Black and White

and his wife are a prominent interracial couple, shown here at the 2012

In the United States there has been an historical disparity between female and Black male ratios: according to the , there were 354,000 White female/Black male and 196,000 Black female/White male marriages in March 2009, representing a ratio of 181:100. This traditional disparity has seen a rapid decline over the last two decades, contrasted with its peak in 1981 when the ratio was still 371:100. In 2007, 4.6% of all married Blacks in the United States were wed to a White partner, and 0.4% of all Whites were married to a Black partner.

The role of gender in interracial divorce dynamics, found in social studies by Jenifer L. Bratter and Rosalind B. King, was highlighted when examining marital instability among Black/White unions. White wife/Black husband marriages show twice the divorce rate of White wife/White husband couples by the 10th year of marriage, whereas Black wife/White husband marriages are 44% less likely to end in divorce than White wife/White husband couples over the same period.

Native American and Asian

Filipino Americans have frequently married people. In the 17th century, when Filipinos were under Spanish rule, the Spanish colonists ensured a Filipino trade between the Philippines and the Americas. When the Mexicans revolted against the Spanish, the Filipinos first escaped into Mexico, then traveled to Louisiana, where the exclusively male Filipinos married women. In the 1920s, communities of workers also grew in , and Filipino American men married women. On the west coast, married Native American women in , .

Asian and Black

With and , the ratios are even further imbalanced, with roughly five times more Asian female/African male marriages than Asian male/African female marriages. However, C.N. Le estimated that among Asian Americans of the 1.5 generation and of the five largest Asian American ethnic groups this ratio narrows to approximately two to one. Even though the disparity between African American and Asian American interracial marriages by gender is high according to the 2000 US Census, the total numbers of Asian American/African American interracial marriages are low, numbering only 0.22% percent for Asian American male marriages and 1.30% percent of Asian female marriages, partially contributed by the recent flux of Asian immigrants.

Historically, men married African American women in high proportions to their total marriage numbers due to few Chinese American women being in the United States. After the , many Chinese Americans immigrated to the Southern states, particularly , to work on plantations. The tenth of counted 57% of interracial marriages between these to be with and 43% to be with women. After the , Chinese American men had fewer potential ethnically Chinese wives, so they increasingly married African American women on the West Coast. In Jamaica and other Caribbean nations as well many Chinese males over past generations took up African wives, gradually assimilating or absorbing many Chinese descendants into the African Caribbean community or the overall mixed-race community.

Native American and White

The interracial disparity between genders among is low. According to the 1990 US Census (which only counts indigenous people with US-government-recognized tribal affiliation), Native American women intermarried European American men 2% more than Native American men married European American women. Historically in Latin America, and to a lesser degree in the United States, Native Americans have married out at a high rate. Many countries in Latin America have large populations; in many cases, mestizos are the largest ethnic group in their respective countries.

Native American and Black

Further information:

In the United States, interracial unions between Native Americans and African Americans has also existed throughout the 16th through early 20th century resulting in some African Americans having Native American heritage.

Throughout American history, there has been frequent mixing between Native Americans and black Africans. When Native Americans invaded the European colony of Jamestown, Virginia in 1622, they killed the Europeans but took the African slaves as captives, gradually integrating them. Interracial relationships occurred between African Americans and members of other tribes along coastal states. During the transitional period of Africans becoming the primary race enslaved, Native Americans were sometimes enslaved with them. Africans and Native Americans worked together, some even intermarried and had mixed children. The relationship between Africans and Native-Americans was seen as a threat to Europeans and European-Americans, who actively tried to divide Native-Americans and Africans and put them against each other.

During the 18th Century, some Native American women turned to freed or runaway African men due to a major decline in the male population in Native American villages. At the same time, the early slave population in America was disproportionately male. Records show that some Native American women bought African men as slaves. Unknown to European sellers, the women freed and married the men into their tribe. Some African men chose Native American women as their partners because their children would be free, as the child's status followed that of the mother. The men could marry into some of the matrilineal tribes and be accepted, as their children were still considered to belong to the mother's people. As European expansion increased in the Southeast, African and Native American marriages became more numerous.

Statistics of black men dating white women Public opinion Interracial marriage in the United States - Wikipedia, the free

Historical data according to

Historically, interracial marriage in the United States was of great public opposition (often a ), especially among whites. According to opinion polls, by 1986 only one third of Americans approved of interracial marriage in general. In 2011, the vast majority of Americans approved of the marriages between different races in general, while just 20 years ago in 1991 less than half approved. It was only in 1994 when more than half of Americans approved of such marriages in general. It should be noted that the approval/disapproval rate differs between demographic groups (for example by race, gender, age, and socioeconomic and marital status).[]

Statistics of black men dating white women Marriage squeeze Interracial marriage in the United States - Wikipedia, the free

Main article:

A term has arisen to describe the social phenomenon of the so-called "marriage squeeze" for females. The "marriage squeeze" refers to the perception that the most "eligible" and "desirable" African American men are marrying non-African American women at a higher rate, leaving African American women who wish to marry African American men with fewer partnering options. According to Newsweek, 43% of African American women between the ages of 30 and 34 have never been married. This figure is similar to the percentage of unmarried women of other races except white females.

Statistics of black men dating white women Education and interracial marriage Interracial marriage in the United States - Wikipedia, the free

Using PUMS data from both the 1980 and 1990 US Census to determine trends within interracial marriage among , , and , it may be seen that (marrying within race) was more prevalent for African American men at lower education levels.[] In 1980, the numbers were as follows: African American males without a high-school diploma participated in endogamy at 96.5%; for those who received a high-school diploma, 95.6%; for those with a college degree and above, the percentage of endogamy were 94.0%.[] Therefore, the total change in percentage among African American men with a college degree was merely 2.5%.[] The rates for African American women changed very little with different educational levels. For the African American woman who had not received a high school diploma the rate was 98.7%, high school diploma was 98.6%, with some college it was 98.2%, and college degree or higher, 98.5%.[] During this time there was a significant increase in marriages between Caucasians and African Americans, maintaining that African Americans are most likely to marry Caucasians over other groups. .[]

The 1990 results show that rates of endogamy dropped for both males and females, albeit more for the African American male.[] In 1990, an African American male with a college degree and more was participating in endogamy at 90.4%; for an African American female with the same educational level, 96.4%.[] The results for the propensity of individuals at higher educational attainment levels to participate less in endogamy over the 10-year period were similar across races, including Caucasians, Hispanics, and Asian Americans.[]

Statistics of black men dating white women Religion and interracial marriage Interracial marriage in the United States - Wikipedia, the free

According to a study "people with no religious affiliation were not statistically more likely to be in intermarriages than evangelical or mainline Protestants or people from other religions" with one exception, . Catholics were twice as likely to be in an interracial marriage than the general population. It is speculated that the reason for this is twofold: the increasing diversity of the (which has seen a huge influx of immigrants, Catholicism has sizable to significant number of adherents from many nationalities worldwide) and the fact that Catholics typically base their choice of parish on geography rather than on its ethnic or racial makeup which creates more opportunities for interracial mixing.

Statistics of black men dating white women Immigrants and interracial marriage Interracial marriage in the United States - Wikipedia, the free

Racial is significantly stronger among recent immigrants. This result holds for all racial groups, with the strongest endogamy found among immigrants of African descent. Interestingly, the gender differences in interracial marriage change significantly when the non-white partner is an immigrant. For instance, female immigrants of African descent are more likely to marry U.S.-born Caucasians than are their male counterparts.

Statistics of black men dating white women Interracial marriage versus cohabitation Interracial marriage in the United States - Wikipedia, the free

In the United States, rates of interracial are significantly higher than those of marriage. Although only 7% of married African American men have European American wives, 12.5% of cohabitating African American men have European American partners. 25% of married Asian American women have European spouses, but 45% of cohabitating Asian American women are with European American men—higher than the percentage cohabiting with Asian men (less than 43%). Of cohabiting Asian men, slightly over 37% of Asian men have white female partners and over 10% married to white women. These numbers suggest that the prevalence of intimate interracial contact is around double that of what is represented by marriage data.

Statistics of black men dating white women See also Interracial marriage in the United States - Wikipedia, the free

Statistics of black men dating white women References Interracial marriage in the United States - Wikipedia, the free

  1. Against 2,1% of the population aged 18 and over.
  2. ^ et al. Human Genetics (2003) 112: 387–399.
  3. Race, Ethnicity, and Genetics Working Group, , Bethesda,
  4. Dunleavy, V.O. (1999) Examining interracial marriage attitudes as value expressive. The Howard Journal of Communications, 15
  5. Knox, D., Zusman, M., Buffington, C., & Hemphill, G. (2000). Interracial dating attitudes among college students. College Student Journal, 34
  6. Firmin, M., & Firebaugh, S. (2008). Historical analysis of college campus interracial dating. College Student Journal, 42.
  7. Gurung, R., & Duong, T. (1999). Mixing and matching: Assessing the concomitants of mixed ethnic relationships. Journal of Social & Personal Relationships, 16.
  8. ^ Fishman, Ray (November 7, 2007). . Slate magazine. Retrieved January 18, 2009. 
  9. (PDF). Newcastle University Press. Retrieved October 25, 2009. 
  10. Hwang, Sean-Shong; Saenz, Rogelio and Aguirre, Benigno E. , Sociological Inquiry, Vol.64, No.2, Nov. 1994, pp. 396-414, and Structural and Assimilationist Explanations of Asian American Intermarriage, Journal of Marriage and the Family, Vol. 59, No. 3, Aug. 1997, pp. 758-772.
  11. ^ Bratter, Jenifer L. . Blackwell Publishing. Retrieved March 13, 2009. 
  12. U.S. Bureau of the Census , December 15, 2010 (. Detailed data can be found in the Statistical Abstract of the United States, from to .
  13. . U. S. Census Bureau. 
  14. ^ Released June 4, 2010; Revised June 15, 2010
  15. ^ June 15, 2010
  16. February 16, 2012
  17. Lange, 2005
  18. ^ Le, C.N. (October 4, 2008). . Asian-Nation: The Landscape of Asian America. Retrieved October 4, 2008. 
  19. . The Washington Post. November 9, 1998. 
  20. Asian Americans and Anti-miscegenation Statutes
  21. ^ Francis C. Assisi (2005). . INDOlink. Retrieved January 2, 2009. 
  22. . . Retrieved January 8, 2009. 
  23. Irving G. Tragen (September 1944). "Statutory Prohibitions against Interracial Marriage". California Law Review. 32 (3): 269–280. : , citing Cal. Stats. 1933, p. 561.
  24. Min, Pyong-Gap (2006). Asian Americans: contemporary trends and issues. Pine Forge Press. p. .   
  25. U.S. Bureau of the Census , December 15, 2010 ()
  26. U.S. Bureau of the Census , 1983. Section 1: Population, file 1982-02.pdf, 170 pp.
  27. Fryer, Jr., Roland G. (Spring 2007). . Journal of Economic Perspectives. 21 (2): 71–90. :. Retrieved July 15, 2008. 
  28. ^ . Color Q World. Retrieved July 15, 2008. 
  29. ^ (PDF). U. S. Census Bureau. 
  30. . Chinese blacks in the Americas. Color Q World. Retrieved July 15, 2008. 
  31. . U.S. Bureau of the Census. July 5, 1994. Retrieved July 15, 2008. 
  32. . . April 15, 2007. Retrieved February 14, 2013. 
  33. ^ . August 16, 2007. Retrieved January 16, 2013. 
  34. Saulny, Susan (February 16, 2012). . . Retrieved February 6, 2013. 
  35. Jayson, Sharon (November 7, 2011). . . Retrieved February 16, 2013. 
  36. Crowder, Kyle D.; Tolnay, Stewart E. (August 2000). (PDF). Journal of Marriage and the Family. Minneapolis, MN: National Council on Family Relations. 62 (3): 792–80. :.  . Retrieved October 25, 2009. []
  37. . Gene Expression. February 23, 2003. Retrieved July 15, 2008. 
  38. ^ January 14, 2013
  39. ^ Qian, Zhenchao; Lichter, Daniel T. (June 2001). . Social Science Research. Academic Press. 30 (2): 289–312. :. 
  40. . University of Michigan. March 23, 2000. Archived from on February 25, 2008. Retrieved May 7, 2016. 
  41. Shim, John (October 22, 2002). . . Archived from on March 4, 2016. Retrieved May 7, 2016. 
Retrieved from ""